Here's another one to add to the unasked and unanswerable questions.
In the book I am currently reading, "The Amarna Age: Egypt" by Frederick Giles, he states that we do not actually know if the famous bust IS Nefertiti. There is nothing that gives a positive identification of the bust--it could possibly be Kiya or Meritaton.
I don't agree, but it makes interesting reading. The whole book is full of mind-blowing information. I heartily recommend it to everyone.

The bust resembiles the Nefertiti who is standing next to her husband Akhenaten in the pictures of the family.

[quote="Ankhesenamun3"]I was wondering how positive the DNA testings are on the gender of a mummy?
The DNA testing of the mummy used a form of that testing called the PCR test, which is considered to be 100% accurate for gender results. The test showed that the "Y" chromosone was there, which only occurs in males.

Interesting,So it can not be Nefertiti or Meriaten.

Well, it seems to really throw a monkey-wrench into all the debate! Still, I'm very--questioning?--about the report. It just seems to be too convienient, in the midst of the big hub-bub over Fletcher's statements. There is no mention of it on Hawass' site, nor in data provided by the SCA site. According to the tale, it was authorized by SCA, the results were given to them, and they turned it over to Hawass. It looks real, though--judge for yourself:
www.cbc.ca/disclosure/archives/040113_n ... a_test.pdf